uReport

City of Bloomington, Indiana

Search

Fields to display

Search Results: (3177)

open #214369

Blocked Sidewalk

911 S High ST

Case Date:
9/22/2026

There is a stand of ornamental grass at this address next to the sidewalk that is impossible for pedestrians to avoid without walking in the street.

closed #214350

Street Lights

Rogers and Patterson Bloomington in

Case Date:
9/21/2026

This light no longer signals for the left hand turn going south

closed #214332

Utility Construction Projects

301 W 2nd ST

Case Date:
9/21/2026

Additional photo for uReport #214330

closed #214330

Utility Construction Projects

301 W 2nd ST

Case Date:
9/21/2026

Detour around closed section of B-Line Trail is not accessible. Following the detour leads pedestrians across a broken tactile curb ramp, across road covered in gravel. The makeshift ramp on the Hopewell side of the street was not able to be climbed by my wheelchair. I couldn't go West around it down 2nd Street on the north sidewalk because it's blocked by stones in the sidewalk. Couldn't go West around it on the south sidewalk because the sidewalk is blocked. Couldn't go East on the north sidewalk because the Seminary Park building has a big drop-off on the sidewalk. I had to ultimately use the Wendy's/Kroger parking lot to get where I needed to go. I'm quite frustrated that detour accessibility is not being planned ahead of time, before a detour is put into place

closed #214327

Traffic Signals

Rogers & Patterson

Case Date:
9/21/2026

The turning lane going North on Rogers turn west on Patterson, is not working.

closed #214295

Traffic Signals

Rogers & Patterson

Case Date:
9/20/2026

The traffic light at Rogers and Patterson/Grimes is a mess. It's not giving left turn signals to north or south bound traffic on Rogers. I saw this twice Friday and also Sunday evening. The light for Grimes is green a really long time. The cross walk is a full countdown even with no one there. This is staying green far long than it used to. The longer been east and west is making more traffic collect north and south on Rogers so it's a big backup at times without turn arrows. It's a mess. Please check it out ASAP.

open #214220

Blocked Sidewalk

508 N Lincoln St

Case Date:
9/19/2026

Ornamental grass overgrown onto sidewalk. Have to step off sidewalk to walk past.

closed #214218

Blocked Sidewalk

301 S College Ave

Case Date:
9/18/2026

This part of the temporary fence fell down and blocked the temporary walkway. I got it balanced precariously but this whole section is in need of more stability. The sandbags seem to be washed away, perhaps add new ones?

closed #214202

Line of Sight

401 N Morton ST

Case Date:
9/18/2026

test

closed #214178

Business

300 W Country Club DR

Case Date:
9/17/2026

Thank you for continuing to investigate this and for forwarding the truck traffic question to Engineering. I wanted to provide some additional information and also clarify a few questions. First, I am not entirely clear on how 2615 S. Kendall Drive relates to the FBM operation or to the semi-truck traffic I originally reported. Could Planning clarify what commercial use was found to be occurring on that residentially zoned parcel? Is that property being used by FBM for access, truck circulation, storage, staging, parking, or some other part of its operations? My concern about truck traffic is also not limited to S. Kendall Drive. Semi-trucks serving FBM continue to travel through the residential neighborhood, including Watson Street and Bryan Street. My broader concern is why semi-trucks serving this commercial facility are routinely entering and traveling through the residential neighborhood at all, rather than accessing the commercial property from Country Club Drive. For Engineering, I would appreciate clarification about whether semi-trucks serving this facility are permitted to routinely use Watson Street, Bryan Street, S. Kendall Drive, and other residential neighborhood streets as access routes. If there are currently no restrictions, does the City have the ability to establish an appropriate truck route or otherwise restrict commercial truck traffic through these residential streets? I also wanted to make Planning and Engineering aware of a significant change in ownership since the property's historic use was established. Lowe's Companies completed its $8.8 billion acquisition of Foundation Building Materials in October 2025. In announcing the acquisition, Lowe's specifically described plans to enhance its Pro business through expanded capabilities, faster fulfillment, improved digital tools, and cross-selling opportunities. I understand that a corporate acquisition alone may not necessarily require new local approvals. However, given the recent change in ownership, Lowe's stated goals for FBM, and Planning's discovery that part of the current operation has expanded onto a residentially zoned parcel, I think it is important to ask whether the nature or intensity of this location's operations has changed or may change enough to require additional City review. I am also unclear how substantially increased fulfillment, truck traffic, or other commercial activity could be accommodated at this particular location without further affecting the surrounding residential neighborhood. If operations at this facility increase, what zoning, site-plan, traffic, access, or development review would be required to determine whether this location and its existing access points can accommodate that activity? Here is Lowe's announcement regarding its acquisition of FBM: https://corporate.lowes.com/newsroom/press-releases/lowes-completes-acquisition-foundation-building-materials-10-09-25 Thank you again for looking into this. I appreciate Planning pursuing the Title 20 issue and Engineering investigating the truck traffic. I would especially appreciate clarification about how the Kendall property fits into FBM's operation and whether commercial semi-truck traffic through Watson, Bryan, Kendall, and the surrounding residential neighborhood is permitted.