Temporary Signage w/o permit
2200 S Walnut ST
- Case Date:
- 9/12/2026
South high school again has all kinds of business advertisements posted. The other campuses do not do this, why is this particular school in Bloomington exempt from regulations? Please address this.
Biking & Walking
320 W 8th ST
- Case Date:
- 9/11/2026
Transients are laying on the b-line between 7th and 8th Streets. They are obviously passed out. I believe this is illegal and should be stopped.
Temporary Signage w/o permit
Clarizz Blvd and Moore's Pike
- Case Date:
- 9/10/2026
'Christmas Lights Installation' sign, attached to a utility pole, across from Arbors Lane.
Temporary Signage w/o permit
2211 E Covenanter DR
- Case Date:
- 9/5/2026
'Faded Lawns' sign in the grass, possibly in the ROW.
Temporary Signage w/o permit
3535 W 3rd ST
- Case Date:
- 8/30/2026
Tropical smoothie cafe signs at multiple intersections in ROW and feather flag display
Sidewalk Requests
3962 E 10th ST
- Case Date:
- 8/26/2026
Google Maps believes E 10th St is entirely walkable, but in fact there is a stretch from the intersection at N Smith until the sidewalk starts at Fountain Park Apartments without any sidewalk. It is not safe to walk, and it also means many directions given online are dangerous.
- Case Date:
- 8/21/2026
I am requesting an inspection of the property at 1800 S. Walnut Street, Bloomington, Indiana, where approximately 63 used/discarded tires are currently being stored outdoors on the grassy area behind the automotive repair facility.
The tires are being stored uncovered and directly on the ground/grass, with numerous tires positioned open-side-up. Several tires are stacked together while others are scattered individually around the area. Based on their condition and the manner in which they are being stored, I am concerned that these may constitute discarded or waste tires rather than properly stored usable tire inventory.
I am particularly concerned about the potential for the tires to collect standing rainwater. The open tires can act as containers for water and potentially create breeding habitat for mosquitoes and other disease vectors. The tire pile is also located immediately adjacent to a wooded/vegetated area and a creek/drainage corridor, which raises additional concerns about rodents, insects, snakes, and other wildlife using the tire pile for shelter or nesting.
The accumulation is also located very close to neighboring business property and appears to be immediately adjacent to the creek/drainage area. I am requesting that the City determine whether the storage area complies with the Bloomington UDO provisions governing vehicle-repair uses and outdoor storage of discarded tires/materials, as well as any applicable riparian-buffer, drainage, stormwater, floodplain, or environmental requirements.
I am also requesting that the City evaluate whether the manner in which these tires are being stored creates a nuisance, fire hazard, mosquito/vector concern, or other health or environmental concern, and whether the property owner/operator is required to remove, relocate, cover, or otherwise properly manage the tires.
I have photographs documenting the current condition and location of the tire accumulation.
I am not asking the City to assume that the tires are waste tires; I am requesting that the appropriate department inspect the property and make that determination based on the applicable Bloomington and Indiana requirements.
Thank you for investigating this matter.
Nuisance Lights
425 E Wylie ST
- Case Date:
- 8/10/2026
Porch light is bright, piercing bulb that casts shadows through the windows of neighboring properties. Tenants (who change most years) tend to leave it on for days/weeks at a time. The fixture is unshielded glass and the bulb sits below that fixture anyway.
Nuisance Lights
1203 S Palmer AVE
- Case Date:
- 8/5/2026
Extremely bright light with exposed and unguarded element left on 24/7. Illuminates rooms in neighboring homes at night.
Business
300 W Country Club DR
- Case Date:
- 7/24/2026
Follow up to report # 211915
Thank you for reviewing my report. I appreciate the time Planning and BPD took to look into my concerns.
I understand BPD's explanation that noise from vehicles operating at a business is not something they can cite as an ordinance violation. However, I don't believe that fully addressed the questions raised in my original report.
I understand the property dates back to 1980 and that there may not be an approved site plan on file. However, if the intensity or nature of the business's operations has changed significantly since that time—particularly with increased semi-truck traffic, early morning unloading activities, or the regular use of residential neighborhood entrances—I was wondering whether those changes would require any additional review, approvals, or compliance with current zoning or development standards.
I also noticed my question regarding truck circulation was not addressed. Specifically, are semi-trucks permitted to routinely access the property through the Broadview neighborhood entrances, or are they expected to use the primary entrance on Country Club Drive? If there is no site plan, is there another document or approval that governs truck access and circulation for the property?
I recognize that businesses have a right to operate and that some level of noise is expected. My concern is not with the existence of the business itself, but whether its current operations and traffic patterns remain consistent with applicable City regulations and whether there are reasonable ways to reduce the impact on the surrounding residential neighborhood.
I would appreciate any clarification you can provide regarding these questions. Thank you again for your time.