uReport

City of Bloomington, Indiana

Search

Fields to display

Search Results: (172)

open #213823

Business

Animal shelter Bloomington

Case Date:
9/5/2026

These guys killed my emotional support animal without not following any kind of protocol they never tried to call me or authorized person I give to them I told them I would be to.puxk up my two dogs and I was told to come on Friday I went to pick my animals up and they told me some lies that no one come to get one on two days prior and that they had put him to sleep this is wrong and I want something done about this .one he's my. E.s.a what in the world is wrong with this business I'm letting every single person know in this community the truth of the horrific events that our local shelter is doing to these innocent animals they committed murder to my best dog rowdy I had him for 7 years in October he has never once bite or harmed anyone in the entire time I give him a good home these people are going to jail they had no right doing this to my family I would like for everyone in this community to.know that our local animal shelter is killing our dogs and cats because they are over crowded please help any info to what I can do about this legally I want them to pay for this they need Shut down !!! PERIOD

open #213805

Taxi Complaints

401 N Morton ST

Case Date:
9/4/2026

I am submitting a complaint regarding Red Tire Taxi concerning both the handling of a trip involving me as a blind passenger and the company’s subsequent response to the accessibility issues I raised. On the outbound portion of the trip, I was not taken to my intended destination. The driver left me at another location, and someone from the disability-related event I was attending had to come find me and assist me the rest of the way. The return trip to my apartment was ultimately completed successfully, although accessibility problems also arose when I needed the driver to come to my location because, as a blind passenger, I could not independently locate the vehicle. Afterward, I contacted Red Tire to discuss what happened. During those conversations, I raised concerns about assistance for blind passengers and effective verbal communication. I explained that a blind passenger cannot necessarily rely on pointing, gestures, or other visual cues and therefore may need clear verbal communication and, in some circumstances, reasonable physical assistance locating a vehicle or reaching the correct entrance or destination. A Red Tire representative told me that company policy was for drivers not to leave their vehicles. I questioned how a blanket policy of that kind would work when a passenger with a disability reasonably needs assistance. I specifically raised the issue of reasonable accommodation under the Americans with Disabilities Act. I was subsequently told that Red Tire would reassess its policies and implement disability training for its drivers. I was also told that the driver involved would not be driving, at least pending appropriate training. I made clear that I did not feel comfortable using Red Tire again until I knew what policy and training changes had been made, and I specifically requested continued updates. I also requested a refund because the outbound trip did not actually deliver me to my intended destination. Red Tire initially offered a 20% refund and characterized the ride as successful because I had been transported and dropped off, even though I had not been delivered to the destination I requested. When I asked how the 20% amount was determined and about the company’s refund policy, I was told that Red Tire does not ordinarily provide refunds and that the 20% was being offered as a gesture of goodwill. I was told that the refund would appear on my card within three to five business days. It did not appear within that stated period, requiring additional follow-up. I have subsequently attempted several times to obtain the promised update regarding disability training and the policy review. Text messages to the Red Tire number through which I had previously communicated successfully began repeatedly failing to send. I therefore followed up by email and received no response. I later called during business hours, reached voicemail, and left a message requesting an update regarding the disability training, policy review, communication issues, and refund. I cannot determine whether the failed text messages were caused by a technical problem or something else, so I am not alleging a cause. However, the overall lack of substantive follow-up is concerning given Red Tire’s previous commitment to keep me informed about the accessibility changes it said it would undertake. I am asking the City of Bloomington to review this matter as a taxi-service complaint, including: 1. Red Tire’s failure on the outbound trip to deliver me to my requested destination; 2. The company’s policy concerning whether drivers may leave their vehicles when a passenger with a disability reasonably needs assistance; 3. Whether Red Tire has actually implemented the disability training and policy review it represented that it would undertake; 4. Whether its procedures adequately address effective verbal communication and reasonable assistance for blind passengers; 5. The handling of my refund request and the characterization of an incorrectly completed outbound trip as a successful ride; and 6. Red Tire’s failure to provide the follow-up it promised regarding these matters. I am attempting to resolve this first at the local level and would appreciate the City reviewing the situation, contacting Red Tire as appropriate, and letting me know what corrective action or other remedy may be available. Thank you, Misty Kienzynski

open #213569

Food Truck Issues

Peoples Park

Case Date:
8/29/2026

Jays kitchen food truck parked illegally at the intersection. Narrowing the street and parking to close to the intersection at a no parking area. Date Friday Aug 21st at 10pm.

closed #213410

Business

320 W 8th ST

Case Date:
8/24/2026

, curious now that it's been proved a point that you were liars from the beginning about your forced vaccination, it's being approved that you actually helped implement a form of forced AIDS inoculation to babies and to think you all yelled nazi farmer's market.

closed #213409

Business

320 W 8th ST

Case Date:
8/24/2026

, curious now that it's been proved a point that you were liars from the beginning about your forced vaccination, it's being approved that you actually helped implement a form of forced AIDS inoculation to babies and to think you all yelled nazi farmer's market.

closed #213059

Business

925 S Curry PIKE

Case Date:
8/12/2026

High pitch sound non stop for 48 hours. Needs to be addressed with Simtra.

closed #212747

Other

380 W 10th ST

Case Date:
7/30/2026

Art installation not lighting up

closed #212663

Website & Web Services Feedback

Case Date:
7/27/2026

The website “gobloomington.org” is either an unofficial site posing as an official city initiative, or it needs fixing. It features the city logo and copyright on the bottom of the page, but none of the links work except for the “register / login” option at the bottom of the page which leads to a gambling website (making it seem like perhaps someone else is using the city’s logo and name as a front for that site?). If this is indeed an official city website, it should not be leading to a scammy gambling site. If it is not an official city website, I hope you are able to file a cease and desist to get the misleading site removed from the web. Thank you.

closed #212221

Business

523 N Lincoln ST

Case Date:
7/8/2026

UPDATE 7/8/2026 — Vehicle recovered. New information for investigation: Tow company: Tow Time Solutions LLC, 1999 N Packing House Rd (Invoice #2305, Call #29202). 1. AUTHORIZATION (BMC 4.32.100(a)): Invoice shows tow requested 7/7/26 at 7:20 PM, completed 8:08 PM — after the management office closed. The invoice's "Authorized by" field reads "(PAV) Lincoln, 305," which is the property address, not a person. Granite's assistant leasing manager stated in writing that towing companies cannot access their parking portal and tow on their own initiative whenever no hanging tag is displayed — i.e., patrol towing with no per-tow written authorization. My 7/8 written request for a copy of the signed authorization is unanswered. My vehicle had been registered in Granite's parking system since 6/22/26 with parking paid. 2. FEES (BMC 4.32.130): Charged $150 tow/hook + $50 "special equipment" (unexplained) + $25 "administrative fee" = $225, paid under protest 7/8/26. I was initially quoted $300 by phone. My written request for the company to identify what equipment was used and the code provision authorizing the admin and equipment charges is unanswered. 3. SIGNAGE (BMC 4.32.110): Lot signs state only a phone number — no company name, no retrieval location, and no schedule of towing/storage fees. Evidence available: invoice/receipt, payment confirmation, protest and request texts, the company's own tow photos, written statements from Granite Management, and parking payment records. Please investigate this company's compliance with Chapter 4.32 and contact me at 317 478 6542 [email protected].

closed #212220

Business

523 N Lincoln ST

Case Date:
7/8/2026

UPDATE 7/8/2026 — Vehicle recovered. New information for investigation: Tow company: Tow Time Solutions LLC, 1999 N Packing House Rd (Invoice #2305, Call #29202). 1. AUTHORIZATION (BMC 4.32.100(a)): Invoice shows tow requested 7/7/26 at 7:20 PM, completed 8:08 PM — after the management office closed. The invoice's "Authorized by" field reads "(PAV) Lincoln, 305," which is the property address, not a person. Granite's assistant leasing manager stated in writing that towing companies cannot access their parking portal and tow on their own initiative whenever no hanging tag is displayed — i.e., patrol towing with no per-tow written authorization. My 7/8 written request for a copy of the signed authorization is unanswered. My vehicle had been registered in Granite's parking system since 6/22/26 with parking paid. 2. FEES (BMC 4.32.130): Charged $150 tow/hook + $50 "special equipment" (unexplained) + $25 "administrative fee" = $225, paid under protest 7/8/26. I was initially quoted $300 by phone. My written request for the company to identify what equipment was used and the code provision authorizing the admin and equipment charges is unanswered. 3. SIGNAGE (BMC 4.32.110): Lot signs state only a phone number — no company name, no retrieval location, and no schedule of towing/storage fees. Evidence available: invoice/receipt, payment confirmation, protest and request texts, the company's own tow photos, written statements from Granite Management, and parking payment records. Please investigate this company's compliance with Chapter 4.32 and contact me at 317 478 6542 [email protected].