Abandoned Vehicle
740 S Parkway DR
- Case Date:
- 6/17/2020
According to municipal code 15.04.020, part 6 I believe that the red vehicle located in the driveway of the property qualifies as an abandoned vehicle. It has been there since February 12, after officers chased the driver into the driveway (see picture). It was partially dismantled soon after and has remained in inoperable condition since that time. As I have witnessed multiple officers approach the house since the time that the car was abandonded, I am not going to approach the house to ask them to remove it. I request that the vehicle be towed. Thanks.
Excessive Growth
740 S Parkway DR
- Case Date:
- 6/10/2020
Abandoned Vehicle
740 S Parkway DR
- Case Date:
- 6/9/2020
The vehicle is up on a block, some metal and other junk in the driveway. It has been there since Christmas (I think). The windows are broken out and it is just an accident waiting to happen. I don't think anyone is living there at this time, grass has not been mowed for sometime. I believe it is a rental. It would be terrible if some kid died over there playing around.
Excessive Growth
3311 W Tapp RD
- Case Date:
- 5/24/2020
This home is in foreclosure and has been abandoned for over a year. Grass and weeds are knee-high. Weed growth in backyard is worse. Tree is growing over side of house and will potentially cause damage.
Excessive Growth
4666 W Sunset AVE
- Case Date:
- 5/19/2020
Excessive Growth
3022 S Market PL
- Case Date:
- 5/11/2020
House at 3022 S. Market Place Bloomington, In yard is severely overgrown and looks vacant. It is making the neighborhood look bad!
- Case Date:
- 3/16/2020
Person in the neighborhood at 740 South Westwood Drive keeps throwing trash in his yard spreading germs.
- Case Date:
- 3/16/2020
Neighbor throwing trash into their yard through front window
Website & Web Services Feedback
7076 W Cavewood CT
- Case Date:
- 3/16/2020
Climate Tax: I do not support Mayor Hamilton’s proposed 37% increase to the local income tax rate to address climate change. Mayor Hamilton has stated that the additional revenue will be used for a “sustainability fund” to “mitigate climate change” and “work for climate justice.” I have no idea what he means by “climate justice,” and the notion that actions taken by a small midwestern city could have any measurable impact on changing the global climate is ridiculous. But more importantly, this proposed tax in regressive and hits people living on a fixed income and the poor the hardest. If you want to help the poor and people living on a fixed income, don’t take any more money away from them for another wasteful government spending program.
Website & Web Services Feedback
7076 W Cavewood CT
- Case Date:
- 3/16/2020
Climate tax