uReport

City of Bloomington, Indiana

Search

Fields to display

Search Results: (119588)

open #202888

Excessive Growth

315 W Dodds ST

Case Date:
5/23/2025

Large yard covered with overgrown weeds at this business. Causing pest issues for us neighbors.

open #202889

Trash

927 W Graham DR

Case Date:
5/23/2025

This trash has been out here for a month. We now have rats in the neighborhood.

open #202899

Potholes, Other Street Repair

912 E University ST

Case Date:
5/23/2025

Many shallow profiles

open #202900

Other

1630 E Maplecrest DR

Case Date:
5/23/2025

Overgrown bush at end of driveway blocks view of driver to east bound traffic.

open #202901

Potholes, Other Street Repair

Case Date:
5/23/2025

there is a hole in S. Morton Street, formerly heat and round, about a foot deep. Others like it along the street have covers with the word"water." This one has no cover, is crumbling and the street around it is breaking up into the hole. I live at 748; this is in street just north of my house.

open #202902

Excessive Growth

720 S Westwood DR

Case Date:
5/23/2025

open #202903

Excessive Growth

720 S Westwood DR

Case Date:
5/23/2025

open #202904

Parks & Playgrounds

S Morton St

Case Date:
5/23/2025

Hello, I am writing about the gravel paths along the bline. They are very inconsistent on each side, and this limits how my wife with a disability is able to talk up and down the bline. Because it is designed for 2-way taffic, her mobility issue means she hazards the wrong side of the path to get to the very helpful gravel parts. From country club road to 2nd street (i’m unsure of condition further NW, the paths are inconsistenly maintained and at time neither side is very good. I’ve seen many other people that use those paths and believe it is an accessibility issue. We hope they can be restored to how they once were. Many paths are only a few inches wide and not enough and some have over growth from spring, some seem very wide and well maintained but only on one side. Thank you for your consideration to this message. I’m only marking this as a ‘complaint’ rather than ‘suggestion’ because i believe it to be an accessability issue as previously stated.